2002 Chevy Express Explorer on 2040-cars
Woodburn, Indiana, United States
Body Type:Van
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:5.7
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
Number of Cylinders: 8
Make: Chevrolet
Model: Express
Trim: explorer
Options: Cassette Player, CD Player
Drive Type: automatic
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Airbag, Passenger Airbag
Mileage: 123,000
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Windows, Power Seats
Sub Model: g1500
Exterior Color: Silver
Interior Color: Gray
listed is an explorer van that's in very good condition , everything works great . rear ac, heat , 8 pass. this van also has a tow package. 50 % on tires . call if any questions 260 580 4087 . thank you .
Chevrolet Express for Sale
- 2007 chevy 3/4-ton commercial cargo delivery service van 1-owner only 4k-miles(US $16,990.00)
- 11 chev express 1500 cargo - factory warranty - one owner florida van(US $16,900.00)
- 2012 chevy express lt 3500 hi-top conversion dvd 10k mi texas direct auto(US $43,780.00)
- 2013 chevy express 2500 cargo van air conditioning 16k texas direct auto(US $20,780.00)
- No reserve custom conversion van luxury explorer rv camper 2500 3500 loaded nice
- No reserve 15 passenger van luxury limo church school bus 2500 3500 loaded nice
Auto Services in Indiana
Wolski`s Auto Repair ★★★★★
Wheels Auto Sales ★★★★★
Tony Kinser Body Shop ★★★★★
Tilley`s Hilltop ★★★★★
Standard Auto Sales ★★★★★
Schepper`s Tires & Batteries ★★★★★
Auto blog
Survey says $25k barrier is a problem for EVs
Sun, 01 Dec 2013
The majority of consumers are more or less priced out of the market.
Electric cars are gaining popularity with the general public, but are they still too expensive? According to a survey 1,084 consumers by Navigant Research, a consulting firm located in Boulder, CO, 71 percent want their next car to cost under $25,000, while 41 percent won't go a cent above $20K. Looks like people are even thriftier than we'd originally thought.
The story of the 2014 Chevrolet SS: "Luxury, power, refinement, handling"
Thu, 07 Mar 2013Not including the women and men who built it, the 2014 Chevrolet SS has only been seen in person by a piddling number of people - fewer humans than would fill the gymnasium at a high school volleyball game. Not including the men and women who built it, no one has driven it. Even so, it is already saddled with two controversies: the way it looks and the way it shifts.
First to that shifting. Did we love the last Americanized Holden, the awesomely sportsome Pontiac G8 GXP, and its six-speed manual? Of course. Do we wish the SS came with a six-speed manual? Of course. But we'd like a toboggan to come with a manual transmission. We'd put a manual transmission on a weasel if we could because we're just wired that way; if it moves, it should come with a stick and a clutch. Or at least the option.
Let's climb down off the ledge, though. We haven't driven the SS and we have no idea how good (or not) the automatic is. And the Hobson's Choice in transmissions when it comes to sport sedans like the BMW M5, Mercedes-Benz E63 AMG and Jaguar XFR-S and, oh yeah, cars-that-really-should-have-manuals like the Audi R8 and Nissan GT-R and Porsche 918 and every single Lamborghini and Ferrari, for instance, hasn't stopped us from enjoying what is clearly the gruesome, dual-clutched demise of Western automotive civilization. Because in spite of our ululations at the dying of the six-speed light, we understand.
Dodge vs. Chevy tug-of-war taken to the extreme
Mon, 17 Dec 2012They say "idle hands are the devil's playground," but said playgrounds grow to Disney-sized proportions when a pair of jacked-up trucks, two egos, a chain and an empty mall parking lot are involved. Proof of this is the video below, which shows a Cummins-powered Dodge Ram circa 2006 to 2008 chained tail-to-tail with what looks to be a gasoline-powered Chevrolet Silverado from the late 1990s or early 2000s.
We don't necessarily have to tell you who wins this battle, but we'll let you see for yourself the lengths the "winning" driver goes to prove his point. There's plenty of foul language in the video below, so beware that this might be Not Safe For Work, and not that we should have to tell you, but please, do not try this at home.