Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2002 Chevy Trailblazer Lt on 2040-cars

US $7,900.00
Year:2002 Mileage:91000 Color: PEWTER /
 GREY
Location:

Mansfield, Ohio, United States

Mansfield, Ohio, United States
Transmission:Automatic
Body Type:SUV
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:4.2L 256Cu. In. l6 GAS DOHC Naturally Aspirated
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
VIN: 1GNDT13S022496234 Year: 2002
Make: Chevrolet
Model: Trailblazer
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Trim: LT Sport Utility 4-Door
Options: 4-Wheel Drive, CD Player
Drive Type: 4WD
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Airbag, Passenger Airbag, Side Airbags
Mileage: 91,000
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Locks, Power Windows, Power Seats
Exterior Color: PEWTER
Interior Color: GREY
Number of Cylinders: 6
Disability Equipped: No
Condition: UsedA vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections.Seller Notes:"NORMAL WEAR ON BODY, MINOR KNICK OR 2 ON FRONT END, MINOR RUST PATCHES ON LOWER REAR DOORS ALTOUGH NO HOLES."

WELL MAINTAINED ONE OWNER VEHICLE PURCHASED HERE IN HOME TOWN, ALL ORIGINAL MILES, NON-SMOKER. VERY CLEAN INTERIOR, NO RIPS OR TEARS IN SEATING OR HEADLINER, NO BURN HOLES, 4WD ON DEMAND(SWITCH) ,AUTOMATIC, AM/FM STEREO/CD PLAYER , KEYLESS ENTRY AND REMOTE START. ALL SWITCHES, LIGHTS, ETC. ARE FUNCTIONAL.TOW-PACKAGE, ONSTAR. POWER DRIVER SEAT. FRONT AND SIDE AIRBAGS. EXTERIOR MAY HAVE A FEW MINOR KNICKS ON FRONT BUMPER/ HOOD REGION FROM NORMAL USE. NEWER BRAKES AND ROTORS/ CALIPERS ON REAR REPLACED. TIRES MAY NEED REPLACED FOR UPCOMING WINTER SEASON. RUNS GREAT, RELIABLE, LOTTA LIFE LEFT IN HER.

Auto Services in Ohio

Walt`s Auto Inc ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Used & Rebuilt Auto Parts, Automobile Salvage
Address: Harrison
Phone: (800) 325-7564

Verity Auto & Cycle Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers
Address: 2504 N Verity Pkwy, Middletown
Phone: (513) 422-1970

Vaughn`s Auto Svc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Accessories
Address: 127 W Sugartree St, Cuba
Phone: (937) 382-7149

Truechoice ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Performance, Racing & Sports Car Equipment, Automobile Accessories
Address: 4677 Northwest Pkwy, West-Jefferson
Phone: (614) 759-4327

The Mobile Mechanic of Cleveland ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Brake Repair, Automotive Roadside Service
Address: Taylor Road, Lakewood
Phone: (216) 744-4888

The Car Guy ★★★★★

New Car Dealers
Address: 637 S 9th St, Hollansburg
Phone: (765) 977-7907

Auto blog

Read This: Auto Extremist advocates for Corvette as brand with multiple models [w/poll]

Fri, 25 Jan 2013

The 2014 Chevrolet Corvette really grinds Peter De Lorenzo's gears. Or, more accurately, the self-anointed Auto Extremist has an issue with what he sees as mismanagement of the legendary sports car by General Motors executives. In a new editorial on his website, De Lorenzo argues it's time to split Corvette off from Chevrolet to create an all-new brand, complete with a model range with at least three new takes on the sports car. Capable of fully leveraging the successes of the Corvette Racing program and brandishing the full might of GM's technical prowess, the Corvette brand would theoretically give Porsche something to sweat over.
Sure, that sounds like a party, but given GM's troubled track record when it comes to launching (let alone managing) brands, we say that's slippery slope that could just as easily end with the whole Corvette franchise in the scrap bin. Either way, the notion is certainly an interesting one. Head over to Auto Extremist to take in the full editorial, and then let us know what you think in Comments. Should GM split off its most storied nameplate?
View Poll

Consumer Reports criticizes small turbo engines for misleading performance, fuel economy claims [w/video]

Tue, 05 Feb 2013

Consumer Reports has taken aim at at small-displacement, forced-induction engines, saying the powerplants don't manage to deliver on automaker fuel economy claims. Manufacturers have long held that smaller, turbocharged engines pack all power of their larger displacement cousins with significantly better fuel economy, but the research organization says that despite scoring high EPA economy numbers, the engines are no better than conventional drivetrains in both categories. Jake Fisher, director of automotive testing for Consumer Reports, says the forced induction options "are often slower and less fuel efficient than larger four and six-cylinder engines."
Specifically, CR calls out the new Ford Fusion equipped with the automaker's Ecoboost 1.6-liter four-cylinder engine. The institute's researchers found the engine, which is a $795 option over the base 2.5-liter four-cylinder, fails to match competitors in acceleration and served up 25 miles per gallon in testing, putting the sedan dead last among other midsize options.
The Chevrolet Cruze, Hyundai Sonata Turbo and Ford Escape 2.0T all got dinged for the same troubles, though Consumer Reports has found the turbo 2.0-liter four-cylinder in the BMW 328i does deliver on its promises. You can check out the full press release below. You can also read the full study on the Consumer Reports site, or scroll down for a short video recap.

Dodge vs. Chevy tug-of-war taken to the extreme

Mon, 17 Dec 2012

They say "idle hands are the devil's playground," but said playgrounds grow to Disney-sized proportions when a pair of jacked-up trucks, two egos, a chain and an empty mall parking lot are involved. Proof of this is the video below, which shows a Cummins-powered Dodge Ram circa 2006 to 2008 chained tail-to-tail with what looks to be a gasoline-powered Chevrolet Silverado from the late 1990s or early 2000s.
We don't necessarily have to tell you who wins this battle, but we'll let you see for yourself the lengths the "winning" driver goes to prove his point. There's plenty of foul language in the video below, so beware that this might be Not Safe For Work, and not that we should have to tell you, but please, do not try this at home.