2005 Chrysler Town & Country Touring on 2040-cars
1065 Ohio Pike, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
Engine:3.8L V6 12V MPFI OHV
Transmission:4-Speed Automatic
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 2C4GP54L05R252324
Stock Num: E80191
Make: Chrysler
Model: Town & Country Touring
Year: 2005
Exterior Color: Magnesium Pearlcoat
Interior Color: Medium Slate Gray
Options: Drive Type: FWD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors
Mileage: 153650
This locally owned Vehicle was just traded in. Haul the whole family in this one. Serviced and ready to roll. Contact Bob Winstel today to set up a test drive. 888-745-0312
Chrysler Town & Country for Sale
- 2014 chrysler town & country touring(US $23,988.00)
- 2009 chrysler town & country touring(US $12,988.00)
- 2008 chrysler town & country touring(US $13,988.00)
- 2009 chrysler town & country touring(US $16,988.00)
- 2010 chrysler town & country touring(US $16,988.00)
- 2006 chrysler town & country touring(US $6,488.00)
Auto Services in Ohio
World Auto Parts ★★★★★
West Park Shell Auto Care ★★★★★
Waterloo Transmission ★★★★★
Walt`s Auto Inc ★★★★★
Transmission Engine Pros ★★★★★
Total Auto Glass ★★★★★
Auto blog
Chrysler extends fuel tank warranties on LX cars, NHTSA ends probe
Tue, 18 Feb 2014The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has ended its investigation of 153,817, 5.7-liter and 6.1-liter Hemi V8-powered 2006 Chrysler 300, Dodge Charger and Dodge Magnum models after reports of stalling. Chrysler has responded by granting a lifetime warranty on the fuel tanks for these vehicles.
NHTSA received 299 reports of engines stalling while the models were stopped or driving at low speeds, and began an investigation. The government agency found that the control valve shutoff float in the V8s' 19-gallon fuel tank could malfunction if the fuel had too high of an ethanol content. In many cases, the valve would break in the open position, allowing the tank to be overfilled, which would then cause the cars to stall. However, there were no accidents reported, and the vehicles could be restarted immediately.
There will not be a recall on these vehicles because, "the condition represents a low risk to motor vehicle safety and is adequately addressed by Chrysler's extended warranty," NHTSA said to The Detroit News.
Chrysler 100, midsize CUV and plug-in hybrid minivan launch bid to go mainstream
Tue, 06 May 2014The news just keeps on rolling from Auburn Hills today, as Fiat Chrysler continues to detail its five-year growth plan. This time round, we're talking about Chrysler. The troubled American brand has been limited in the past few years to the lamentable Sebring/200, the Town & Country and the 300, although that's likely to change in the coming years.
"The Chrysler brand is not luxury - it's not premium. Chrysler is the mainstream American brand," brand CEO Al Gardner said during today's presentation.
Gardner set a sales target of 800,000 units by 2018, which marks an increase of 350,000 units compared to its 2013 sales results. That's a pretty big ask for a brand that's struggled to define itself over the past decade.
Move over Audi, now Chrysler has a beef with Tesla's claims
Thu, 23 May 2013In the same week that Audi said "not so fast" to some claims from Tesla, Chrysler has responded to a new press release from the California-based EV-maker by saying "not exactly, Tesla." The statement, released through the company's blog, comes in response to Tesla claiming it was "the only American car company to have fully repaid the government." Chrysler notes that it, too, recently paid back Uncle Sam from its 2008 bailout. Similar to Audi's recent press release, which was eventually and mysteriously deleted from the German automaker's site, Chrysler is both right and wrong in its statement.
Tesla specifically said that it had paid back the Department of Energy loans that many automakers received - including Fisker and VPG Autos - while Chrysler's retort argues Tesla is "unmistakably incorrect" since it repaid the government in 2011 a full six years early. Technically, the statements from both automakers are correct, but Tesla's startup loan originated from the DoE, while Chrysler's loan came in bailout form from the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP). Further, as The Detroit News notes, Chrysler's loan still cost taxpayers well over a billion dollars after all was said and done - those negative assets tied to "old Chrysler" in the bankruptcy did not require repayment.