Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1969 Dodge Superbee Clone on 2040-cars

US $33,000.00
Year:1969 Mileage:12038
Location:

Mesa, Arizona, United States

Mesa, Arizona, United States

 1969 Dodge Supebee Clone for sale. In very good condition. This car has a 440 Six Pac Engine with the 727 Torqueflight Transmission.
Hemi Orange Paint with liftoff Sixpac Fiberglass Hood. Everything on the car works and it looks like new. Has aftermarket wheels and ac/heat. Call Daniel at 480-343-8854

Auto Services in Arizona

Yates Buick Pontiac GMC ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 13845 W Test Dr, Cashion
Phone: (623) 377-9166

Valley Express Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Inspection Stations & Services, Automobile Repairing & Service-Equipment & Supplies
Address: 629 W Broadway Rd, Guadalupe
Phone: (480) 630-1279

Unlimited Brakes & Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Brake Repair
Address: 2027 W Glendale Ave, Glendale-Luke-Afb
Phone: (602) 246-1175

The Tin Shed Auto ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Brake Repair, Automobile Salvage
Address: 6221 N 55th Ave Lot 7, Goodyear
Phone: (602) 253-2553

Son`s Automotive Svc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 21632 N 7th Ave Ste 6, Youngtown
Phone: (623) 516-9165

San Martin Tire Shop ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers
Address: 6415 N 59th Ave, Tolleson
Phone: (623) 915-0777

Auto blog

Dodge Journey gets new $24,895* SE V6 AWD model

Wed, 12 Mar 2014

While the Dodge Journey crossover remains largely unchanged for the 2014 model year, there are two new flavors of the seven-passenger CUV on offer: the butch-looking Crossroad, and the SE V6 AWD, pictured right, which makes its debut today. As its name suggests, this new Journey model features the automaker's 3.6-liter Pentastar V6, and offers all-wheel drive, which, with a starting price of $24,895 (*excluding $995 for destination), reduces the cost-of-entry for an AWD-equipped Journey by $1,800 versus the SXT AWD model. Scroll down for the official press blast.

Dodge Dart falls short of Consumer Reports Recommended, Caddy XTS and Lincoln MKS, too

Thu, 22 Nov 2012

The Dodge Dart, Cadillac XTS and Lincoln MKS all failed to earn a "Recommended" rating from Consumer Reports. When it came to the compact Dart, the organization's testers thought the vehicle offered a quiet cabin, solid-feeling chassis and nimble suspension, but the new model ultimately fell short of the coveted rating due to powertrain issues. The institute's reviewers found the base 2.0-liter four-cylinder engine to be underpowered and noted "drivability issues" when the available turbocharged 1.4-liter four was paired with the optional dual-clutch transmission (some of our editors disliked it paired with the six-speed manual). CR also dinged the latter powerplant for sounding "raspy." For what it's worth, we think the forced-induction engine offers an excellent and playful exhaust note, but that's just us.
As for the XTS, CR lauded the car for its luxurious cabin, but the vehicle's experience was dulled by its finicky CUE infotainment interface. Overall, the big Cadillac scored much higher than its cross-town rival from Lincoln. While testers found the American luxury sedan to offer a quiet ride and quality fit and finish, they felt the MKS delivered a "cramped driving position, ungainly handling, uncomposed ride, and limited visibility." Ouch. At the end of the day, both cars fell short of rivals from Japan, Germany and Korea. Check out the full press release below with more details, along with CR's musings on the Chevrolet Spark and Lexus ES.

Dodge vs. Chevy tug-of-war taken to the extreme

Mon, 17 Dec 2012

They say "idle hands are the devil's playground," but said playgrounds grow to Disney-sized proportions when a pair of jacked-up trucks, two egos, a chain and an empty mall parking lot are involved. Proof of this is the video below, which shows a Cummins-powered Dodge Ram circa 2006 to 2008 chained tail-to-tail with what looks to be a gasoline-powered Chevrolet Silverado from the late 1990s or early 2000s.
We don't necessarily have to tell you who wins this battle, but we'll let you see for yourself the lengths the "winning" driver goes to prove his point. There's plenty of foul language in the video below, so beware that this might be Not Safe For Work, and not that we should have to tell you, but please, do not try this at home.