2013 Dodge Durango Crew on 2040-cars
6000 S 36th St, Fort Smith, Arkansas, United States
Engine:3.6L V6 24V MPFI DOHC
Transmission:Automatic
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 1C4RDJDG3DC551407
Stock Num: P4373
Make: Dodge
Model: Durango Crew
Year: 2013
Exterior Color: Bright White Clearcoat
Interior Color: Black
Options: Drive Type: AWD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors
Mileage: 23369
All wheel drive. Shopping with the VIP department gives you VIP Pricing! Haggle-free pricing means a pleasant experience for all of us. Call/text 866-414-7840 to speak with Jackie, Alyssa, James or Jon. We price low and fair, allowing us to focus on your needs. We'll find you the best deal on the perfect pre-owned vehicle. Come experience a unique and enjoyable purchase process!
Dodge Durango for Sale
- 2014 dodge durango sxt(US $39,070.00)
- 2014 dodge durango limited(US $41,910.00)
- 2014 dodge durango r/t(US $48,115.00)
- 2014 dodge durango citadel(US $48,675.00)
- 2014 dodge durango citadel(US $48,675.00)
- 2014 dodge durango r/t(US $49,960.00)
Auto Services in Arkansas
Williams Terry Auto Sales ★★★★★
The Car Connection ★★★★★
Southern Electronics ★★★★★
Russell Chevrolet ★★★★★
River City Radiator Inc ★★★★★
Paul Miller Motors Inc ★★★★★
Auto blog
Does the future of Fiat-Chrysler include Dodge?
Thu, 13 Jun 2013Wards Auto reports the future of Dodge is looking uncertain. Fiat has more or less laid out it's game plan for the next few years, and while the Chrysler, Fiat and Jeep lines are set to receive plenty of love, Dodge isn't so lucky. Fiat has already hobbled Dodge significantly by splitting off the brand's trucks into a separate Ram line.
Wards says that after the Avenger rides off into the sunset early next year, Fiat-Chrysler won't replace the model, leaving a gaping midsize hole in the Dodge lineup. The report also cites unnamed sources as saying that at least two other current Dodge products will move to the Chrysler line.
One of those could very well be the Grand Caravan. Chrysler has already made it clear that it plans to trim redundancy between its minivan offerings, but it has yet to clarify which other vehicle could sail under the Chrysler banner moving forward. Either way, such changes to the product line would theoretically leave Dodge with just four models.
Top torque-to-weight ratios under $100k, $50k and $25k
Tue, 07 Oct 2014Horsepower may steal a lot of headlines, but the always-more-complex torque figure is often a critical one for both the workingman and the motoring playboy. The measure of rotational force represents the twist that can liquefy one's tires or haul one's horse trailer. Good stuff.
It follows then, that as with the horsepower-to-weight list that we assembled for you a few months ago, a list of cars that offer the most pound-feet with the fewest pounds to carry, is an interesting one to break down. Sure, there's a big difference in how the torque is applied from a turbocharged six-cylinder in a Swedish luxury sedan and a massive heavy-duty truck's turbo-diesel. But being the car/stat geeks that we are, we think it's kinda neat that those two vehicles rank near each other where torque and weight intersect.
As with the horsepower list, we've given you figures as pounds per every one pound-foot. Again broken down into broad price categories, we've got a mixed bag of 2014 and 2015 models here, too. Every effort has been made to select the most up-to-date prices and specs, and we've also to omitted some '14 cars that won't be re-upped after the ongoing yearly changeover.
Dodge vs. Chevy tug-of-war taken to the extreme
Mon, 17 Dec 2012They say "idle hands are the devil's playground," but said playgrounds grow to Disney-sized proportions when a pair of jacked-up trucks, two egos, a chain and an empty mall parking lot are involved. Proof of this is the video below, which shows a Cummins-powered Dodge Ram circa 2006 to 2008 chained tail-to-tail with what looks to be a gasoline-powered Chevrolet Silverado from the late 1990s or early 2000s.
We don't necessarily have to tell you who wins this battle, but we'll let you see for yourself the lengths the "winning" driver goes to prove his point. There's plenty of foul language in the video below, so beware that this might be Not Safe For Work, and not that we should have to tell you, but please, do not try this at home.