1989 Ford Bronco Ii Xlt 2.9l 5spd 2wd Great Shape Many New Parts on 2040-cars
Phillipsburg, New Jersey, United States
Body Type:2dr Suv
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:2.9L V6
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
Number of Cylinders: 6
Make: Ford
Model: Bronco II
Trim: xlt
Options: CD Player
Drive Type: 2WD
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Locks, Power Windows
Mileage: 80,879
Exterior Color: Red
Interior Color: Red
Ford Bronco II for Sale
- 1986 ford bronco ii xlt sport utility 2-door 2.9l
- 1966 ford bronco pickup(US $24,500.00)
- 1984 ford bronco ii eddie bauer sport utility 2-door 2.8l
- 1977 ford bronco ranger restored orange 2nd owner 30k original miles(US $18,000.00)
- 1989 ford bronco ii xlt plus sport utility 2-door 2.9l
- 1987 ford bronco ii xlt *project truck*
Auto Services in New Jersey
Woodbridge Transmissions ★★★★★
Werbany Tire And Auto Repair ★★★★★
Vonkattengell Transmission Service ★★★★★
True Racks Ltd ★★★★★
Top Dude Tint ★★★★★
TM & T Tire ★★★★★
Auto blog
Ford to update Sync, MyFord Touch software... again
Wed, 07 Aug 2013Ford hasn't had the best luck with its MyFord Touch and Sync systems, as the finicky infotainment system has been subject to a critical whooping while customer issues have helped sink Ford's IQS scores. The automaker has made a concerted effort, though, to try and fix MyFord Touch. And while the results have been mixed, The Blue Oval is hoping its latest free update, set to go live next week, will make things better.
According to a report from The Detroit News, the new system promises streamlined voice commands with fewer levels between opening query and actual result. Ford is also addressing where certain options are selected on the touchscreen. Rather than working one of the four quadrants on the homescreen, users will be able to select anywhere within the quadrant to make adjustments.
While it might only be a band-aid for MFT's problems, the fact that Ford is still trying to improve it is a promising sign. It's going to take more than just this update to address the system's ills, though.
Ford gives police chiefs tech to surveil officers in their own cars
Tue, 28 Oct 2014Police officers certainly have a difficult job in keeping the streets safe, but as public employees in positions of authority, there is still a very real need for oversight. To that end, Ford is partnering with a tech company to offer a new system called Ford Telematics for Law Enforcement on its line of Police Interceptor patrol vehicles that could make cops safer, while giving cities a better idea of what its officers are doing.
The system streams live data about cruisers back to the home base to people like the police chief or shift supervisor. That info includes expected things like speed, location and cornering acceleration, but it gets incredibly granular as well, with records of things like if emergency lights are on, or even if an officer is wearing a seatbelt.
Ford Telematics for Law Enforcement "ought to protect officers as much as it protects the public," said Ford spokesperson Chris Terry to Autoblog. Constantly monitoring patrol cars offers cities a lot of advantages, too. First, it reduces potential liability because a department can prove where each vehicle is at all times. Also, officers know they are being watched and may potentially drive more safely.
Tier 1 suppliers call GM the worst OEM to work with
Mon, 12 May 2014Among automakers with a big US presence, General Motors is the worst to work for, according to a new survey from Tier 1 automotive suppliers, conducted by Planning Perspectives, Inc.
The Detroit-based manufacturer, which has been under fire following the ignition switch recall and its accompanying scandal, finished behind six other automakers with big US manufacturing operations. Suppliers had issues with trust and communications, as well as intellectual property protection. GM was also the least likely to allow suppliers to raise their prices in the face of unexpected increases in material cost, all of which contributed to 55 percent of suppliers saying their relationship with GM was "poor to very poor."
GM's cross-town competitors didn't fare much better. Chrysler finished in fifth place, ahead of GM and behind Dearborn-based Ford, which was passed for third place this year by Nissan. Toyota took the top marks, while Honda captured second place.