2006 Ford F-150 Xl Standard Cab Pickup 2-door 5.4l on 2040-cars
Hendersonville, Tennessee, United States
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:5.4 V8
Fuel Type:GAS
For Sale By:Private Seller
Number of Cylinders: 8
Make: Ford
Model: F-150
Cab Type (For Trucks Only): Standard cab with 4 doors
Trim: xl
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Airbag, Passenger Airbag
Drive Type: rear wheel drive
Power Options: Air Conditioning
Mileage: 132,300
Exterior Color: White
Interior Color: Gray
This is a very clean 2006 Ford F150 XL with reg cab and 4 doors. It has a fiberglass hard cover over the bed with a lock. The tailgate also has a lock. This vehicle has 132,300 miles with records to show it was service every 5,000 miles It has a automatic trans with overdrive. It also has airconditioning. There is a small tear (picture) on the drivers side seat done by a screwdriver in pocket. The tires are in very good condition. There are two small creases on the passenger side door and rear panel. These are very minor and the paint is not cracked there.
Ford F-150 for Sale
- 1997 ford f-150 xl standard cab pickup truck 2door 4.2l long bed super low miles(US $4,500.00)
- 1976 ford f150 4x4
- 1997 ford f-150 xl standard cab pickup 2-door 4.2l(US $1,500.00)
- Ford f150 clean pick up
- Black 3-door 1998 ford f150 xlt 4.6l
- 2013 xlt extended 4x4 trailer hitch gray cloth v8 we finance 8k miles
Auto Services in Tennessee
Wholesale Inc ★★★★★
White & Peels Auto Center ★★★★★
West Broad Auto Sales ★★★★★
Topside Auto Sales ★★★★★
Tire Barn Warehouse ★★★★★
Stout`s Riverside Auto Center ★★★★★
Auto blog
2015 Ford Mustang EcoBoost
Fri, 16 May 2014Earlier this week, Ford invited us to Charlotte, NC, to ride in an all-new 2015 Mustang fitted with its turbocharged 2.3-liter EcoBoost four-cylinder. It's the first forced-induction, four-cylinder ponycar for the Blue Oval since the sun set on the 1986 Mustang SVO. We jumped at the opportunity, as only a handful of people have ever been in the passenger seat of this new car, and most automotive media won't get as close as we did until this fall.
As we revealed in our Deep Dive, Ford will slot this new turbocharged four as premium powerplant between its naturally aspirated 3.7-liter V6 and the naturally aspirated 5.0-liter V8. At last mention, the automaker said the direct-injected, all-aluminum engine will develop 305 horsepower and 300 pound-feet of torque, returning the best fuel economy of the three powerplants in the process. History buffs will note that those figures are appreciably stouter than the 200 horses and 240 lb-ft that the '86 SVO realized out of the same displacement, and the latter's figures were hugely impressive at the time. On paper, the new EcoBoost four looks to be a good fit for most owners who want to balance performance with efficiency - we were eager to see how it felt from the passenger seat.
Riding Notes
2015 Ford Mustang EcoBoost flogged and analyzed by Ignition
Mon, 13 Oct 2014Aside from the way it looks and perhaps its independent rear suspension, the biggest bit of news on the 2015 Mustang may be the inclusion of its 2.3-liter, turbocharged four-cylinder engine. That blown mill marks the first time since the Mustang SVO of the '80s that a turbo has been fitted under the engine of Ford's pony car.
The Mustang EcoBoost is the subject of the latest episode of Ignition from Motor Trend, giving us a great look at the technical, nitty-gritty side of the turbocharged coupe. Covering it from bow to stern, host Carlos Lago walks us through the boosted Ford before taking to the track for some driving impressions, with particular praise given to the low-end grunt of the 2.3-liter mill.
Check out the full video and then let us know which 2015 Mustang has your interest piqued the most - the EcoBoost four, the 5.0L V8 or the entry-level V6.
Nuclear-powered concept cars from the Atomic Age
Thu, 17 Jul 2014In the 1950s and early 60s, the dawn of nuclear power was supposed to lead to a limitless consumer culture, a world of flying cars and autonomous kitchens all powered by clean energy. In Europe, it offered the then-limping continent a cheap, inexhaustible supply of power after years of rationing and infrastructure damage brought on by two World Wars.
The development of nuclear-powered submarines and ships during the 1940s and 50s led car designers to begin conceptualizing atomic vehicles. Fueled by a consistent reaction, these cars would theoretically produce no harmful byproducts and rarely need to refuel. Combining these vehicles with the new interstate system presented amazing potential for American mobility.
But the fantasy soon faded. There were just too many problems with the realities of nuclear power. For starters, the powerplant would be too small to attain a reaction unless the car contained weapons-grade atomic materials. Doing so would mean every fender-bender could result in a minor nuclear holocaust. Additionally, many of the designers assumed a lightweight shielding material or even forcefields would eventually be invented (they still haven't) to protect passengers from harmful radiation. Analyses of the atomic car concept at the time determined that a 50-ton lead barrier would be necessary to prevent exposure.