Crew Cab Lariat 4x4 Powerstroke Diesel Nav Leather 20 Wheels Low Miles Pipe Chip on 2040-cars
American Fork, Utah, United States
Fuel Type:Diesel
For Sale By:Dealer
Transmission:Automatic
Body Type:Pickup Truck
Make: Ford
Options: Compact Disc
Model: F-250
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Side Airbag
Mileage: 17,314
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Windows
Sub Model: Lariat
Exterior Color: White
Interior Color: Tan
Doors: 4
Number of Cylinders: 8
Cab Type: Crew Cab
Engine Description: 6.7L V8 DIR OHV 32V
Drivetrain: 4-Wheel Drive
Warranty: Vehicle has an existing warranty
Ford F-250 for Sale
- Leather - heated seats - automatic - power stroke
- Ford : 1997 f-250 supercab 7.3l powerstroke diesel 4x4 lwb low miles no rust
- 1965 ford truck f250 all original v8 252 4sp
- 1 owner low miles 04 ford f-250 xlt crewcab 6.0l turbo diesel 4x4 auto like new
- 1999 ford f 250 xlt super duty v8 7.3l 2wd power stroke diesel ext cab 4 dr
- 04 f250 lariat power-stroke (lifted) exhaust swb 4x4 flares stunning monster tx!(US $15,995.00)
Auto Services in Utah
Willey Honda ★★★★★
The Junk Car Buyer ★★★★★
Schneider Auto Karosserie Body & Paint ★★★★★
Patterson`s Auto ★★★★★
Henry Day Ford ★★★★★
Harrisons Mobile Auto Repair ★★★★★
Auto blog
Ford dinged by OSHA for asbestos at Buffalo plant
Sat, 20 Jul 2013Ford has come under fire from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) for violations regarding asbestos exposure in a company metal stamping plant in Buffalo, NY. OSHA has cited Ford for eight violations in total, according to an Automotive News report, and faces fines of up to $41,800. 537 workers are employed at the stamping facility.
The violations include a pipefitter at the facility being exposed to asbestos-containing material while working on a steam line, other workers exposed to the material without respiratory protection and work areas that were not designed to limited the number of workers in contact with asbestos. Further, areas in which asbestos was present were not properly restricted, and levels of asbestos in the air were not monitored.
According to an unnamed Ford spokesperson in the AN report, the company feels that the OSHA citation is erroneous saying, "We have fully cooperated with the local OSHA officials and we don't believe the citations are warranted." Ford also maintains that it will work with the authorities to resolve the issue.
Ford settles class action suit over defective Navistar diesel engines
Fri, 25 Oct 2013The 2003 Ford F-Series Super Duty (shown above) introduced the 6.0-liter Power Stroke diesel supplied by Navistar, and while that is an engine Ford would love to forget, it's now one step closer to putting that particular problem behind it. Automotive News is reporting that Ford has settled a class-action lawsuit brought on by problems with this engine that started right out of the gate and ultimately broke up the 30-year relationship between Ford and Navistar.
Owners and lessees of 2003-2007 Super Duty trucks and E-Series vans equipped with the 6.0-liter Power Stroke are eligible for deductible reimbursements of between $50 and $200 from the original five-year/100,000-mile engine warranty, while Ford is paying out as much as $825 for out-of-warranty engine repairs. These repairs may include the exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) cooler, EGR valve, oil cooler, fuel injectors and turbocharger, but are only covered if the components failed before six years or 135,000 miles.
In total, Ford has agreed to pay about 50 percent of the value of the repairs and deductibles paid by its customers who submit a claim before the end of this year, and $150,000 is going to the 16 named plaintiffs in the case; Navistar was not included in the lawsuit.
EPA says fuel economy test for hybrids is accurate
Mon, 26 Aug 2013
The EPA says it stands behind its fuel economy test for hybrid vehicles following controversy about the testing process after Ford C-Max Hybrid customers and automotive journalists alike struggled to achieve 47 miles per gallon, the advertised mpg number, Automotive News reports. Ford responded to the issue almost two weeks ago by claiming that a 1970s-era EPA general label rule was responsible for the inaccurate mileage numbers, rerating the C-Max Hybrid's mpg numbers and offering customers rebates. Ford later said it didn't overstate the C-Max Hybrid's fuel economy and that it was surprised by the low numbers.
Ford technically didn't do anything wrong because it was following the general label rule, but agency regulator Christopher Grundler says the automaker was exploiting a loophole when it came up with the hybrid C-Max numbers, and that the testing process remains accurate. The general label rule allows vehicles that use the same engine and transmission and are in the same weight class to share fuel economy numbers, but it doesn't take into account other factors such as aerodynamic efficiency, which affects hybrids more drastically than non-hybrid vehicles. Ford originally used the Fusion Hybrid economy figures for the C-Max Hybrid and claimed the engineers didn't realize that its aerodynamic efficiency would affect fuel economy as much as it did.