2003 Land Rover Freelander S Sport Utility 4-door 2.5l on 2040-cars
Southport, Connecticut, United States
Engine:2.5L 2500CC 153Cu. In. V6 GAS DOHC Naturally Aspirated
Vehicle Title:Salvage
Transmission:Automatic
For Sale By:Private Seller
Body Type:Sport Utility
Make: Land Rover
Mileage: 31,000
Model: Freelander
Exterior Color: Silver
Trim: S Sport Utility 4-Door
Interior Color: Beige
Drive Type: AWD
Options: 4-Wheel Drive
Number of Cylinders: 6
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Power Windows
Car runs and drives, but is not road-worthy. Fender-bender, car was scrapped by insurance company. New left front fender, headlight. Alignment of steering wheel out of whack. AIRBAGS DEPLOYED AND NOT REPLACED YET.
Minor dents on right front door. Good tires, low mileage.
BUT DON'T PLAN ON DRIVING THIS CAR BEFORE FINISHING REPAIRS.
SALVAGE TITLE -- YOU MUST RETITLE IT (FOR PROFESSIONALS ONLY) OR SCRAP IT.
Pick up in Southport, CT.
Land Rover Freelander for Sale
- 2002 land rover freelander ** no reserve **
- Runs great!!! low mileage(US $6,500.00)
- 2002 land rover freelander hse sport utility 4-door 2.5l
- 04 freelander hse-29k-fog lamps-full size spare-front push guard-leather-sunroof(US $8,995.00)
- 2002 land rover freelander s sport utility 4-door 2.5l(US $4,795.00)
- 2005 land rover freelander se sport utility 4-door 2.5l
Auto Services in Connecticut
Wrb Auto Sales ★★★★★
Windsor Wheels ★★★★★
Turnpike Tire & Auto Service ★★★★★
Toyota Motor Sales ★★★★★
Tire Clinic Plus ★★★★★
Superior Transmission Inc ★★★★★
Auto blog
Jaguar crossover won't be based on Evoque or have off-road chops
Wed, 21 Aug 2013Jaguar's long-rumored crossover won't be built on the same platform as the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, says the Australian site Car Advice. The future of the new CUV remains uncertain, but if Jaguar does dip its toes into the SUV/crossover pool, though, the new vehicle will likely be a car-based soft roader, lacking (or perhaps more appropriately, not needing) the off-road-engineered chops inherent in Land Rover's small CUV platform.
Jaguar product planner Steven De Ploey explained to Car Advice, "There's many groups around the world [platform sharing] - obviously Volkswagen Group is doing it all the time - but I think we have to be careful. He added, "Jaguar is something quite different... It's about capability, but very much on-road focused capability." That seems to gel with our suspicions that the XQ, as it's expected to be called, will share its platform with an upcoming small Jaguar sedan, the oft-rumored X-Type successor.
Still, we'd recommend taking any mention of a Jaguar crossover with a grain of salt. Based on many of the (quite compelling) statements made by De Ploey against a Jag crossover and previous statements made by Jag's design boss, Ian Callum, the case against a leaper-bearing crossover seems strong. If a high-rider were to arrive from Jaguar, though, the article insinuates that it'd be more in line with the BMW X6 or upcoming X4 - sort of a coupe-based crossover. Like we said, grain of salt. If a Jag crossover is going to arrive soon, the upcoming Frankfurt Motor Show is the most likely locale for its debut. We'll find out in a few weeks.
Jaguar Land Rover calls in handful of vehicles over suspension bolts
Thu, 24 Apr 2014With most recalls seemingly affecting mass-market vehicles, it'd be all too easy to assume, consciously or otherwise, that higher-end automobiles never face such issues. But the main reason we don't see the NHTSA recalling more luxury automobiles isn't because of their quality, we'd postulate: it's because of their relative scarcity.
Take Jaguar Land Rover, recalls of whose vehicles we only seem to have cause to report about once a year. So if you're figuring they're about due, here you go. The Indian-owned British auto group has just announced two recalls, both regarding suspension components: one affecting Jaguars and another concerning - you guessed it - Land Rovers.
First up we have a recall for 2013 to 2014 model year Jaguar XJ, XF and XK models - a whopping 297 of them - which have been found to have problematic toe links. Separation of the toe link from the rear sub-frame could result in impaired stability and control over the vehicle's direction, so JLR is calling them in to replace the nuts and washers on the rear toe links.
Jaguar may join the FWD, small-car parade
Tue, 13 Aug 2013Was it right for Chevrolet to detune the 1975 Corvette's base engine to 165 horsepower? Was Aston Martin wrong to make the Toyota iQ-based Cygnet? Is BMW crazy to be testing the new 1 Series with three-cylinder engines and front-wheel drive? It seems now, just as in the 1970s and 1980s, that emissions regulations and social considerations are driving some automakers to adopt unbefitting practices to maintain acceptance in the eyes of governments and consumers. Jaguar has jumped on the bandwagon, and is considering development of small, frugal, front-wheel-drive cars to help lower Jaguar Land Rover's average vehicle CO2 levels in light of tightening European emissions regulations, Autocar reports.
By 2020, the European Union expects the model range of every manufacturer to average 95 grams per kilometer, which is a new law passed by the European Parliament in April. Manufacturers who make more than 300,000 vehicles per year must meet these targets, and JLR is expected to be producing up to 700,000 vehicles per year by then. CO2 regulations after 2020 will only get stricter, as EU politicians already are talking about lowering CO2 levels to between 68 g/km and 78 g/km. (To put that in perspective, Autocar posits that driving a fully charged electric vehicle in Europe produces about 75 g/km when factoring in the power-generation infrastructure.)
Jaguar has some choices here, but so far they all have drawbacks. It could develop a new, compact chassis architecture for a line of compact vehicles, but the investment required for such a project could be prohibitively expensive. Jaguar has been looking into using the Land Rover Evoque platform for a small SUV, Autocar reports, but Land Rover brand manager John Edwards raises issue with such a plan, saying it may not be financially feasible.