2001 Ford Taurus Ses Clean, Well Maintained on 2040-cars
Trumbull, Connecticut, United States
2001 Ford Taurus SES
114K Well Maintained Miles-owned by same family since 2002. No accidents. Title in hand. 3.0L OHV V6 Cold A/C CD Player 6-Passenger capable Huge Trunk Oil Changed religiously every 3,000 with Motorcraft Synthetic Blend and Filter Transmission Fluid and Filter changed regularly Coolant Flushed 100K Service done - Serpentine Belt, Tensioner, PCV, Platinum Plugs/Wires, Fuel Filter New Michelin Defender Tires with 90K mile Treadwear rating Front End Alignment Done New 60 Month Battery Trailer Hitch for small trailer, Bike Rack, etc. Sorry to see this go, great car, but have too many vehicles. Located in Trumbull, CT Sold as-is, no warranty. |
Ford Taurus for Sale
- 1994 ford taurus, 3.0 l / v6 - 133,935 original miles - runs super fantastic(US $1,499.00)
- Ford taurus sho v8(US $2,500.00)
- 2011 black cloth rear camera v6 duratec lifetime warranty we finance 40k miles
- 2013 ford taurus se automatic 4-door sedan
- 2015 sho new turbo 3.5l v6 24v automatic awd sedan moonroof premium
- 2007 ford taurus se 4door sedan icecoldairconditioning 3liter 6 cylinder
Auto Services in Connecticut
Valenti Motors Inc ★★★★★
Tires Plus Wheels ★★★★★
Story Brothers Inc ★★★★★
South Valley Auto ★★★★★
People`s Auto LLC ★★★★★
Pandolfe`s Auto Parts ★★★★★
Auto blog
Detroit Three autoworkers could get huge bonuses
Mon, 06 Jan 2014For a long time, being a line worker for one of the Detroit Three has meant living with an uncertain future. With the health of American automakers on the rise, though, things are also starting to look up for the men and women building the cars. The latest sign that things aren't bad? Big profit-sharing checks.
According to The Detroit News, Ford, General Motors and Chrysler could end up paying over $800 million to 130,000 workers as part of a profit-sharing plan. According to The News, the economic impact of these profits in Michigan alone could exceed $400 million, besting the NFL's Super Bowl, MLB's All-Star Game and the NHL's Winter Classic for their economic impact.
This is the third straight year the Detroit Three have issued profit-sharing checks to UAW employees, and for many workers, the checks are as close as they'll get to a raise, due to the most recent contract between the union and the manufacturers. On average, employees at GM and Ford receive $1 for every $1 million in North American (not just the US) pre-tax profits. Chrysler, meanwhile, gets a similar deal, although the Auburn Hills-based company calculates profit sharing using 85 percent of the brand's global profits.
Consumer Reports explains its disdain for infotainment
Thu, 20 Mar 2014One of the perks of reviewing all manner of cars and trucks is that we're exposed to all the different infotainment systems. Whether Cadillac's CUE, Chrysler's UConnect, BMW's iDrive or MyFord Touch, we sample each and every infotainment system on the market.
Not surprisingly, some are better than others. It seems consumers have come to a similar consensus, with Consumer Reports claiming that Ford and Lincoln, Cadillac and Honda offer the worst user infotainment experiences. Not surprisingly, you won't find much argument among the Autoblog staff.
Take a look below to see just what it is about the latest batch of infotainment systems that grinds CR's gears. After that, scroll down into Comments and let us know if you agree with the mag's views.
Nuclear-powered concept cars from the Atomic Age
Thu, 17 Jul 2014In the 1950s and early 60s, the dawn of nuclear power was supposed to lead to a limitless consumer culture, a world of flying cars and autonomous kitchens all powered by clean energy. In Europe, it offered the then-limping continent a cheap, inexhaustible supply of power after years of rationing and infrastructure damage brought on by two World Wars.
The development of nuclear-powered submarines and ships during the 1940s and 50s led car designers to begin conceptualizing atomic vehicles. Fueled by a consistent reaction, these cars would theoretically produce no harmful byproducts and rarely need to refuel. Combining these vehicles with the new interstate system presented amazing potential for American mobility.
But the fantasy soon faded. There were just too many problems with the realities of nuclear power. For starters, the powerplant would be too small to attain a reaction unless the car contained weapons-grade atomic materials. Doing so would mean every fender-bender could result in a minor nuclear holocaust. Additionally, many of the designers assumed a lightweight shielding material or even forcefields would eventually be invented (they still haven't) to protect passengers from harmful radiation. Analyses of the atomic car concept at the time determined that a 50-ton lead barrier would be necessary to prevent exposure.